Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Angwatt CS1 Pro edges out the Honey Whale G3 Pro overall: it rides a bit more refined, feels more planted at speed, and offers stronger real-world range and braking for the money, if you can live with its quirks and long charging time. The Honey Whale G3 Pro fights back with bigger tyres, excellent lighting, higher load capacity and slightly better hill performance, but feels rougher around the edges as a daily tool.
Choose the CS1 Pro if you want a fast, comfy "big city" scooter with a very grown-up ride and don't mind doing a bit of tinkering. Go for the G3 Pro if you're heavier, have steeper hills, crave that overbuilt "mini-moped" feel and value included accessories and monster tyres more than outright polish.
Both are powerful toys masquerading as transport - keep reading to find out which flavour of overkill actually fits your life.
Electric scooters have grown up. The Honey Whale G3 Pro and Angwatt CS1 Pro are exactly the kind of machines that make you look at your car keys in the morning and think, "Do I really need you today?" They sit in that dangerous sweet spot: fast enough to be thrilling, big enough to feel like real vehicles, and (on paper) just affordable enough to tempt sensible adults into slightly irresponsible purchases.
I've spent time with both: city commutes, late-night blasts, cobblestone torture tests, and the usual "why did I take the shortcut over this construction site?" moments. On the surface they're siblings - big batteries, serious motors, chunky suspension, NFC gizmos - but the way they ride and live with you day to day is surprisingly different.
If the G3 Pro is the loud gym bro who insists you try deadlifting your bodyweight "for fun", the CS1 Pro is the slightly calmer mate who still rides too fast but at least remembers to stretch. Let's unpack which one deserves your money - and your hallway space.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the "prosumer performance commuter" bracket: far beyond entry-level rentals, but not yet in the insane dual-motor, motorcycle-money league. Think riders who do proper distances, want car-like pace in the city, and don't flinch at the idea of a 30-kg scooter.
The Honey Whale G3 Pro targets people chasing maximum power and stability on a budget: huge tyres, big battery, chunky frame, lots of included extras. The Angwatt CS1 Pro aims at a similar rider but leans more towards refined city comfort - slightly smaller wheels, higher-voltage system, more sophisticated braking, and a bit more polish in how the power comes on.
They're direct rivals for the same wallet: fast single-motor tanks with proper suspension, NFC security and price tags hovering around the psychological 1.000 € line. If you're shopping one, you'd be mad not to consider the other.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Honey Whale G3 Pro (or try to) and the first impression is "industrial appliance". The frame is thick, angular aluminium with a faux carbon finish on deck and arms that looks sportier than it feels. In the hands it's solid but a touch agricultural: welds are honest rather than pretty, and the overall vibe is more "urban enduro" than sleek city tool. The adjustable handlebar is a nice touch, though it doesn't completely hide the fact that some components feel generic.
The Angwatt CS1 Pro also comes from the "no, it's not a toy" school, but its iron-and-aluminium chassis feels a bit more thought through. Edges are cleaner, the central display integrates the NFC nicely, and once you've gone over the folding mechanism with an Allen key (you should), the stem and frame feel pleasantly rigid. It still screams Chinese direct-to-consumer, but in a way that suggests the factory has done this a few times before.
In terms of design philosophy, the G3 Pro screams "overbuilt off-roadish brute" while the CS1 Pro is more "urban performance utility". Both are sturdy; the CS1 Pro just feels slightly less prototype-ish out of the box, while the G3 Pro relies on sheer mass and oversized bits to convince you it'll survive your commute.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where personalities really diverge.
The Honey Whale G3 Pro rolls on massive 12-inch tubeless tyres. That extra diameter over the CS1 Pro's 11-inch rubber doesn't sound huge on paper, but on bad surfaces it's obvious: the G3 Pro steamrolls potholes, tram tracks and curb edges with a "was that a bump?" shrug. The dual spring suspension is on the firm side initially, and feels a bit budget in its damping, but once it beds in you get a stable, slightly heavy-footed ride that suits higher speeds. It's more SUV: soft enough over the big stuff, a bit chattery on high-frequency ripples.
The Angwatt CS1 Pro counters with a better-sorted suspension package. The travel isn't dramatically different, but the tuning feels more active and controlled. Hit a recessed manhole cover on the CS1 and you feel one compression, one rebound, done. On the G3 Pro you sometimes get a "boing-boing" echo, especially at the back. The slightly smaller wheels still handle rough city tarmac well, though on very broken surfaces the G3's extra size advantage shows.
In fast corners, the CS1 Pro wins. The combination of lower-profile 11-inch tyres, wide bars and a tauter chassis makes it more eager to lean and less vague mid-turn. The G3 Pro is rock-stable in a straight line but feels like a bigger, taller machine when you flick it side to side - safe, yes, but not particularly playful. If your riding is mostly straights and ugly asphalt, the G3 is a sofa; if you like carving bike-path bends, the CS1 Pro is the more entertaining partner.
Performance
Both of these scooters belong firmly in the "don't lend it to your fearless friend" category.
The G3 Pro's rear motor may have a lower rated output on paper, but it delivers its power in a way that feels almost comically eager off the line. In the highest mode, a jab of thumb throttle sends it lunging forward like it has something to prove. On flat ground it happily pulls you to speeds that feel very un-bikelane, and it keeps its grunt surprisingly well when the road tilts upwards. On steep urban ramps with a heavier rider, it slows, but doesn't humiliate itself. You do notice, though, that the throttle mapping is a little abrupt: it's quick, but not exactly sophisticated.
The CS1 Pro with its higher-voltage system and beefier controller comes across as marginally more mature. Acceleration is still strong - you'll beat most cars to the next set of lights - but the power delivery is smoother and more linear. Top-end speed is in the same "this should really be classed as a moped" bracket, but the Angwatt feels calmer as it approaches its limit. The motor note is less strained, and you're less tempted to back off purely because the chassis feels more settled.
Where the CS1 Pro starts to show cracks is serious hills with heavier riders. With a decent-sized rider and a steep gradient, it will haul you up, but your ego and speed will both take a hit. The G3 Pro, despite being the cheaper machine, actually feels a tad more determined on climbs, helped by its gearing and torque bias. If you live somewhere properly hilly, I'd pick the Honey Whale; for mostly flat cities with the odd flyover, the Angwatt's nicer throttle feel wins.
Braking, however, is clearly in Angwatt's favour. The hybrid setup - hydraulic rear, mechanical front plus electronic regen - gives a smoother, more controllable stop with less hand effort. You can feather speed on the rear and only drag the front when you need to. The G3 Pro's dual mechanical discs do the job, but lever feel is more "cable and springs" than "precision instrument", and you'll be adjusting them more often.
Battery & Range
On paper, both scooters promise ranges that would make an e-bike blush. In the real world - mixed speeds, some hills, a rider who isn't a featherweight - they land comfortably in the "do my commute twice without panic" bracket, with the CS1 Pro stretching the lead.
The G3 Pro's pack is no slouch and will handle a long urban day if you're not pinning it in top mode everywhere. Ride reasonably in the middle mode and you can string together a morning commute, a lunch dash and the route home without nervously eyeing the last bar. Start hammering hills at full boost with a heavier rider, though, and you'll watch the gauge drop faster than you'd like.
The CS1 Pro's battery is simply bigger, and you feel it. My mixed-pace rides consistently ended with a healthier remaining buffer than on the Honey Whale for similar distances and speeds. You also get a slightly more stable power feel over the first two-thirds of the charge, before the inevitable voltage sag rears its head near the end. The sting in the tail is charging: the G3 Pro will go from empty to full comfortably within a working day or overnight; the CS1 Pro is more of an "plug in when you get home and don't expect miracles" affair. If you're the type who forgets to charge things, the Honey Whale's faster refill is kinder.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: neither of these belongs on a packed metro at rush hour unless you enjoy being hated.
Both are around the 30-kg mark and feel every gram of it when you have to lift them. The G3 Pro actually feels a touch more awkward because of its taller stance and heavier front end; carrying it up a few stairs is an event, not an afterthought. It does fold down into a car boot-friendly package, but loading it is a two-handed grunt. The folding mechanism itself is surprisingly confidence-inspiring - once locked upright, stem wobble is minimal.
The CS1 Pro is no feather, but its folded dimensions and centre of gravity make it marginally less hateful to drag around. The stem latch benefits from a spanner session when new; otherwise, rattles can appear. Once sorted, it folds and unfolds quickly enough for practical daily use - think car-trunk commuting or rolling it into an office corner, not sprinting downstairs with it to catch a train.
In day-to-day practicality, the Honey Whale gets brownie points for its included accessories: bag, lock, phone holder, tool kit - you genuinely can unbox it and ride without an immediate extra shopping list. The CS1 Pro is less generous out of the box but has the better integrated cockpit and NFC interface. Both have sensible decks and enough storage friendliness for people with a hallway or garage; neither is suited to tiny flats and third-floor walk-ups unless you treat lifting as your gym routine.
Safety
Safety splits into three things here: stopping, seeing, and staying upright.
On stopping, as mentioned, the Angwatt's braking wins. That hydraulic rear combined with electronic assist just inspires more confidence when scrubbing off speed from the top end. It also reduces hand fatigue on longer descents. The mechanical discs on the Honey Whale have enough bite, but modulation is coarser and lever feel changes as cables stretch and pads wear. You'll want to stay on top of adjustments.
In lighting, the tables turn. The G3 Pro goes all out: bright headlight, proper tail light, turn signals and those side frame lights that paint a glowing outline on the road. At night it looks like a rolling sci-fi prop, and more importantly, drivers actually notice you. The CS1 Pro has a decent light package with indicators and side lighting, but the notorious too-short headlight cable can limit steering angle if you don't fix it. That's not just annoying; it's potentially dangerous if left unaddressed.
Stability is a closer call. Both scooters feel far more planted than smaller-wheeled commuters, but the Honey Whale's 12-inch tyres do give it an extra dose of "rails" feeling over rough patches - it's particularly forgiving if you're not super precise with line choice. The Angwatt counters with better overall chassis tuning: it tracks straighter at higher speeds and feels less vague in fast sweepers. Grip from the tubeless tyres on both is good; in the wet, rider judgement will matter more than fine differences between them, and in either case you should treat rain as "get home carefully", not "time trial".
Community Feedback
| HONEY WHALE G3 PRO | ANGWATT CS1 PRO |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The G3 Pro undercuts the CS1 Pro by a decent margin. For that lower price you get a big battery, serious motor, 12-inch tyres, excellent lights and a pile of accessories. On a pure "how much metal and watt-hours per euro" basis, it looks extremely tempting. It feels like the brand's strategy is to shout "look at the spec sheet!" and hope you don't look too closely at the details.
The CS1 Pro costs more but gives you a bigger battery again, a higher-voltage system, better braking, and a notably more refined riding experience. The downside is the slow charging and some silly QC oversights, but once sorted, it behaves like a scooter that could easily wear a more expensive badge. For riders doing longer commutes or wanting something that feels closer to a matured product rather than a parts bin special, the extra spend is easier to justify.
In short: if budget is tight and you want maximum spec for the least cash, the Honey Whale has the headline win. If you're playing the long game - longer range, nicer ride, better brakes - the Angwatt quietly offers better value in actual use.
Service & Parts Availability
Neither of these is backed by a dense European service network, so it pays to be realistic.
Honey Whale is growing in certain regions but is still niche. Official service points are patchy and you'll quickly discover that local bike shops aren't always thrilled to wrestle 12-inch tubeless tyres off a hub motor. The included tool kit and an active DIY community soften the blow, but you should be comfortable with at least basic spanner work or know a friendly mechanic.
Angwatt leans heavily on big online retailers and their support structure. In practice, that often means reasonably responsive email support and parts shipping, but you are still the workshop. The upside: the CS1 Pro's more conventional wheel and brake layout is slightly easier for generic shops to accept than the Honey Whale's oversized setup. Neither brand screams "worry-free local warranty", but the Angwatt ecosystem currently feels a bit more mature in terms of replacement parts and responsiveness.
Pros & Cons Summary
| HONEY WHALE G3 PRO | ANGWATT CS1 PRO |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | HONEY WHALE G3 PRO | ANGWATT CS1 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (peak) | 1.640 W rear hub | 1.500 W brushless rear |
| Top speed | ca. 60 km/h | ca. 56-60 km/h |
| Real-world range | ca. 40-45 km | ca. 45-55 km |
| Battery | 48 V 18 Ah (864 Wh) | 52 V 22,5 Ah (ca. 1.170 Wh) |
| Weight | 31 kg | 30 kg |
| Max load | 150 kg | 120 kg |
| Brakes | Dual mechanical discs | Front mechanical disc, rear hydraulic + E-ABS |
| Suspension | Front & rear springs | Front & rear spring shocks |
| Tyres | 12-inch tubeless all-terrain | 11-inch tubeless road |
| IP rating | IPX5 (splash resistant) | Improved water resistance (no formal IP) |
| Charging time | ca. 6 h | ca. 10 h |
| Price | 931 € | 1.072 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing and look at how they behave on real streets, the Angwatt CS1 Pro comes out as the more complete scooter for most riders. It's smoother, more comfortable, and more confidence-inspiring at high speed, and the combination of strong range and excellent braking makes it a better everyday companion, especially for longer commutes on mixed urban surfaces.
The Honey Whale G3 Pro is not outclassed; it's just more specialised and a bit rougher. It makes sense if you're heavier, have proper hills in your life, and want that extra tyre size and load margin. Its lighting is genuinely superb, and if you're price-sensitive, it delivers a lot of hardware for the asking figure. You just have to accept that it feels more like a big, enthusiastic experiment than a fully dialled-in product.
So: if you want a fast, comfy daily that feels grown up and you can tolerate some DIY on day one, the CS1 Pro is the smarter choice. If you prioritise brutal torque, huge tyres, load capacity and a slightly lower price - and you don't mind a bit of roughness around the edges - the G3 Pro will still put a foolish grin on your face every time you open the throttle.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | HONEY WHALE G3 PRO | ANGWATT CS1 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 0,93 €/Wh | ✅ 0,92 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 15,52 €/km/h | ❌ 19,14 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 35,88 g/Wh | ✅ 25,64 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,52 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,54 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real range (€/km) | ❌ 2,07 €/km | ✅ 1,95 €/km |
| Weight per km of real range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,69 kg/km | ✅ 0,55 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 19,20 Wh/km | ❌ 21,27 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 27,33 W/km/h | ❌ 26,79 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0189 kg/W | ❌ 0,0200 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 144 W | ❌ 117 W |
These metrics strip away emotion and look only at maths. Price-per-Wh and price-per-kilometre show how much usable energy and range you get for each euro. Weight-based metrics tell you how much mass you're hauling around for a given battery or performance level. Efficiency (Wh/km) reveals how gently each scooter sips its battery in real use, while power ratios show how much motor muscle is available relative to top speed or overall heft. Finally, average charging speed gives an idea of how quickly each scooter refills its "tank" from the wall socket.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | HONEY WHALE G3 PRO | ANGWATT CS1 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier, bulkier feel | ✅ Marginally lighter, better balance |
| Range | ❌ Shorter real range | ✅ Goes further per charge |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly better top rush | ❌ Marginally lower ceiling |
| Power | ✅ Stronger hill torque hit | ❌ Softer on steep climbs |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller total capacity | ✅ Bigger "fuel tank" |
| Suspension | ❌ Harsher, less controlled | ✅ Plusher, better damped |
| Design | ❌ Chunky, a bit crude | ✅ Cleaner, more coherent look |
| Safety | ✅ Better lighting, visibility | ❌ Lighting cable quirk hurts |
| Practicality | ✅ Accessories, faster charging | ❌ Fewer extras, slow charges |
| Comfort | ❌ Firm, slightly busy ride | ✅ Smooth, composed cruising |
| Features | ✅ NFC, strong lights, extras | ✅ NFC, hydraulic brake, display |
| Serviceability | ❌ Bigger wheels, trickier tyres | ✅ Easier workshop acceptance |
| Customer Support | ❌ Patchy, region-dependent | ✅ Better via big retailers |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Brutal, rowdy acceleration | ❌ More sensible, less wild |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels more parts-bin | ✅ Slightly more refined |
| Component Quality | ❌ Average brakes, suspension | ✅ Nicer brakes, better tuning |
| Brand Name | ❌ Less recognition overall | ❌ Also relatively unknown |
| Community | ✅ Growing, active DIY scene | ✅ Strong enthusiast presence |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Side glow, strong presence | ❌ Good, but less dramatic |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better executed package | ❌ Headlight cable issue |
| Acceleration | ✅ Punchier off-the-line feel | ❌ Smoother, slightly calmer |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Silly-grin hooligan vibes | ✅ Satisfied, "this just works" |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Harsher, more tiring | ✅ Relaxed, cushy cruising |
| Charging speed | ✅ Respectably quick turnaround | ❌ Long overnight sessions |
| Reliability | ❌ More fussy maintenance | ✅ Fewer chronic complaints |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulky, awkward package | ✅ Slightly neater footprint |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, feels more unwieldy | ✅ Marginally easier to lug |
| Handling | ❌ Stable but a bit lazy | ✅ Sharper, more precise |
| Braking performance | ❌ Mechanical only, needs tweaks | ✅ Hydraulic rear inspires trust |
| Riding position | ✅ Adjustable bar, big deck | ✅ Tall, natural stance |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, slightly basic | ✅ Better cockpit integration |
| Throttle response | ❌ Jumpy in high mode | ✅ Smoother power delivery |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ More generic, basic look | ✅ Central, integrated, modern |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC plus included padlock | ✅ NFC, decent deterrent |
| Weather protection | ✅ Formal splash rating | ❌ More "at your own risk" |
| Resale value | ❌ Less sought-after badge | ✅ Stronger current desirability |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Popular with modders | ✅ Plenty of tweak headroom |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Tyres and brakes fiddlier | ✅ Workshop-friendlier hardware |
| Value for Money | ❌ Good spec, rough edges | ✅ Better balance spec/experience |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the HONEY WHALE G3 PRO scores 6 points against the ANGWATT CS1 PRO's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the HONEY WHALE G3 PRO gets 16 ✅ versus 28 ✅ for ANGWATT CS1 PRO (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: HONEY WHALE G3 PRO scores 22, ANGWATT CS1 PRO scores 32.
Based on the scoring, the ANGWATT CS1 PRO is our overall winner. Between these two bruisers, the Angwatt CS1 Pro simply feels closer to what a fast, big-battery city scooter should be: composed, confidence-inspiring and willing to turn a long commute into something you actually look forward to. It may demand a little patience with charging and a quick spanner session when new, but once sorted it fades into the background and just does its job with a quiet, satisfying competence. The Honey Whale G3 Pro is louder, rougher and occasionally more exciting, but it never quite escapes the sense that you're riding a well-specced prototype rather than a fully resolved product. If you pick the CS1 Pro, you're choosing the scooter that's more likely to keep you comfortable, safe and quietly happy long after the novelty has worn off.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

